Review King Kong (1976)

Amyghost

Member: Rank 3
Sorry, Doc, but it's an underwhelming effort at a monster film. I know it features the special effects work of Carlo Rambaldi and Rick Baker, but I can't say I'm impressed by it. When you see King Kong from a distance, it's painfully obvious that it's a guy in an ape suit. And when you see King Kong up close, I'm not convinced for a moment that any of his separate parts - such as his arm, body or head - are connected together as one living creature.

I also know the film won the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects, but it somehow manages to look less impressive than the original film, which is at least 43 years older than it is. If you ask me, that's one hell of an accomplishment. It must have been a real slow year at the Academy Awards...

And as for Jessica Lange... My god was that woman irritating in that film! As King Kong was carrying her through the jungle back to his territory, I was actually shouting at the TV set, "For fucks sake, just eat the bitch! And I don't mean in a good way..." For me personally, the only amusing thing she did in the entire film was comment on the fact that she was one of the only women to ever be saved by DEEP THROAT (1972). I refer to the film, not the act.

In any case, the best parts of this film for me were the presence of René Auberjonois and the musical soundtrack by John Barry. However, at least it didn’t take as long to watch as that interminable fucking version Peter Jackson did, back in 2005... and 2006... and 2007! What? You say Peter Jackson's version was only three hours long... That's strange, it felt more like three years to me.
"And as for Jessica Lange... My god was that woman irritating in that film! As King Kong was carrying her through the jungle back to his territory, I was actually shouting at the TV set, "For fucks sake, just eat the bitch! And I don't mean in a good way..." For me personally, the only amusing thing she did in the entire film was comment on the fact that she was one of the only women to ever be saved by DEEP THROAT (1972). I refer to the film, not the act."
Gawd am I glad to know I'm not the only one who feels that way about La Lange. I sometimes think I'm one of the five people on the planet who has never been sold on her as an actress. Even the best thing she's done, Titus, looked pretty much as if her 'performance' had been largely stitched together in the editing room. And I've had the dubious pleasure of being totally underwhelmed by her in live performance in The Glass Menagerie.

Your post, BTW, made me laugh so hard I nearly got caught out by my co-workers just now.
 

Carol

Member: Rank 5
The original 1933 King Kong is great,
Yes! But did you ever have the chance to see it on the big screen - it's terrifying! Till I went to my very first all-night science-fiction marathon and saw those TEETH as big as Stonehenge boulders I never understood why my mum told me she'd hidden under the seat and never saw the ending the first time round - so she never knew they left the island or even got to New York. OK, she was 11 at the time, and maybe my grandparents didn't know what they were taking their little girl to see that day...
 

Doctor Omega

Member: Rank 10
THE LOST KONG MOVIE

THE LEGEND OF KING KONG (1976)

The_Legend_of_King_Kong_Ad.jpg

History

In 1975, Dino De Laurentiis and Paramount Pictures signed a deal with RKO Pictures to produce a remake of the original 1933 King Kong with a tentative release date of 1976. When Universal Pictures learned about this, they claimed that they had a previous oral agreement with RKO to produce their own remake, which RKO denied. Universal proceeded to sue both Paramount and RKO for the rights to King Kong, while at the same time beginning production on their own King Kong remake. Universal hoped that by producing their Kong film quickly, it would pressure Paramount and De Laurentiis to give up production on their film. Universal announced the start of filming for The Legend of King Kong for January 5, 1976, with a targeted release date of that fall.

Universal hired Academy Award-winning screenwriter Bo Goldman to write the screenplay for the film, and hired the relatively unknown but acclaimed Joseph Sargent to direct. Special effects artist Jim Danforth offered to produce the effects for the film using stop-motion animation like in the original film, but Universal worried that it would be far too expensive and planned to have Kong be portrayed by a man in a suit, like he was in King Kong vs. Godzilla and King Kong Escapes. They also intended to very closely follow the 1933 film, using the same characters, creatures, and general plot of the original film, even keeping it set in 1933.

Eventually, a federal judge ruled that Paramount did in fact have the rights to produce a remake of King Kong, and that RKO had exclusive rights to the 1933 film. However, the judge also ruled that the character rights to Kong belonged to the estate of Merian C. Cooper, and they were subsequently transferred to his son Richard, who then sold them to Universal. Universal abandoned its plans for The Legend of King Kong, and Paramount went ahead and produced King Kong. After Paramount and De Laurentiis' rights to King Kong expired, Universal revived the project and prepared to release a new remake in the late 1990's, though the releases and subsequent poor receptions of Mighty Joe Young and GODZILLA in 1998 convinced them to postpone the project. Universal hired acclaimed director Peter Jackson to produce the film in the early 2000's using the Legend script. Jackson discarded and rewrote the script, then directed King Kong in 2005.

Trivia
  • Universal hoped their quick production of The Legend of King Kong would make De Laurentiis hesitant to film King Kong, but it instead convinced him to complete casting and begin filming for the film months earlier. Stuntman Rick Baker, who designed and portrayed Kong in Paramount's film, later said he regretted not having enough time to design the King Kong suit due to the accelerated production on the film.

The_Legend_of_King_Kong_Triceratops.jpg The_Legend_of_King_Kong_Storyboard_Panels_2.jpg The_Legend_of_King_Kong_Storyboard_Panels_1.jpg 6XgYmKj.png



In 1976, there were actually two rival King Kong remakes being developed. Due to the thorny rights situation surrounding King Kong and King Kong, both Universal Studios and producer Dino De Laurentiis found themselves working on Kong projects. The Universal version was to be a 1930s period film titled The Legend of King Kong, directed by Joseph Sargent from a screenplay by Bo Goldman, starring Peter Falk as Carl Denham. De Laurentiis was working on a modern update, written by Lorenzo Semple Jr.
When word got out that Universal was pushing forward to get their film into production and released first, De Laurentiis doubled down himself, starting production with the goal of having the film out by December of 1976. He’d effectively called Universal’s bluff (they cancelled their project and wouldn’t finally exercise their remake rights until 2005).

The Universal remake that competed with Paramount for a remake in the 1970s, lets check out what went into the cancelled production of The Legend Of King Kong.





 
Last edited:

Doctor Omega

Member: Rank 10
Were we robbed?

Would the world have been better with Peter Falk as Denham and (a rumoured) Susan Blakely instead of Jessica Lange?






And I see that the Universal version would have had dinosaurs too!

Instead of what we got...
 

Doctor Omega

Member: Rank 10
911-tourist-guy.png


That reminds me of the above photo that did the rounds after the tragedy.

Long since disproved as a hoax.

(I think!Well, 99 percent sure it is anyway!)
 

Doctor Omega

Member: Rank 10
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tourist-wtc-911/


However, aside from all the digital imperfections in the image (e.g., shadows of different objects that don’t correspond to the same light source, the date-time stamp in the wrong type of font), a number of logistical errors proved it to be suspect beyond credibility:

  • September 11 was a warm and sunny late summer day, not the type of weather in which a tourist would have been decked out in a winter coat and hat.
  • The airliner shown in the picture is approaching from the north and would therefore have been the plane that hit the north tower of the World Trade Center (WTC1), but WTC1 did not have an outdoor observation deck. The south tower (WTC2) included an indoor observation deck on the 107th floor and an outdoor deck above the 110th floor, but WTC1 housed only Windows on the World, an indoor restaurant with a magnificent view of the city but no outdoor deck.
  • The operating hours in September for the WTC2 observatories were 9:30 A.M. to 9:30 P.M., meaning they opened too late for a tourist to have been present on one of them on September 11 before the first plane hit the WTC at 8:49 A.M.
  • The aircraft shown is a Boeing 757 bearing American Airline markings, but Flight 11, the only American flight to crash into the World Trade Center, was a 767. (The 767 is a wide-body jet; the 757 is a smaller, standard-body craft. This photograph on Airliners.net, from which the image of the plane used here was probably taken, is of a Boeing 757.)
 
Top