chainsaw_metal1
Member: Rank 8
I'm quite okay with it. I get rather tired of seeing it used by conservatives on the web who really have no idea what they're saying, so long as they're repeating something they heard on Faux News.
SERIES 11: 31% liked it.
I wholeheartedly agree. Alas, where do we find this wunderkind? You would think that this is a show that people would be lining up to take the reins, and yet, they had to twist this guy's arm to do it.Chibnall may be a nice guy, but I feel he has to be let go and bring in a firebrand, who is more than happy to produce 13 episodes of a once again kick-ass show.
If only we could find another Hinchcliffe.but certainly I think a non-fan "showrunner" is needed, of Hinchcliffe proportions,
They’ve actually been thinking about making the Doctor a woman since the 4th Doctor. I think as long as the show is well-written, and the actor is up to snuff, anybody can play the Doctor. Some of the stories this series have been a little “meh” but it’s not bad. I hope Chibnall lets someone else do the writing next season.Chinballs, Moffhack and all the lunatic fringe who have eased themselves into positions of power can all go and rot for all I care! They've ruined the best television show ever and tried to destroyed our childhood heroes because they weren't fans as kids themselves or are part of a madness to change the basic human identities of the entire human race! This idea to make the Doctor a woman or black or whatever rather than an eccentric middle aged white guy was bound to fail but Chinballs like the BBC refused to listen and that's why even if it came back with a new man and not a word, the damage has already been done!
JB
The woman since the Fourth Doctor bit was a joke made by Tom Baker at the press call in 1980 as I recall!
Jesus, what are you trying to do, start a rumble? You know how many fanboys you are going to incite?It is laced with sexism, racial prejudice and a farcical budget.
It is laced with sexism, racial prejudice and a farcical budget.
Which is weird, because what we saw with Marvel Studios is that having fans work on the movies made them better. Joss Whedon was a huge comic book fan, and made Avengers, which was amazing. We also saw what happened when they brought in Zack Snyder to work for DC. Not a fan in the classic sense, and made some pretty terrible films. And yet, when we have fans brought in to work on Who, it seems to backfire.Fans being in charge of the asylum has not helped either
Yes, I don't understand why that is so.when we have fans brought in to work on Who, it seems to backfire
this Paul something (who wrote a Who novelisation)