clayton-12
Member: Rank 4
I'll kick things off, if I may ...
29+1 (Kearen Pang, 2017) tells of a successful Hong Kong career woman facing up to impending 30th birthday, and re-evaluating her expectations of life in the process. It began with a shaky start, coming across like a Hong Kong cross between Bridget Jones and Sex and the City, as we’re introduced to calorie neurosis, a going-nowhere relationship with an irresponsible man-child, and all-my-friends-are getting-married crisis. However, the film does improve significantly when a second character, a diametrical opposite of our career girl, is introduced, and events cause people to think about mortality, and what their legacy will be. In its most emotional scenes, the film does not come across as manipulative at all, which was kind of surprising given how derivative the first part of the film was. And a shock revelation towards the end completely blindsided me.
The other point of note is that the film is based on an apparently successful stage play that Pang apparently wrote and starred in, and the film makes little attempt to distance itself from its origins, with scenes from the live show playing over the end credits. While the film didn’t have the air of a play merely being filmed, as a film it probably suffered structurally from trying to stay close to its roots. All in all, not a great masterpiece, but it wasn’t half bad either.
29+1 (Kearen Pang, 2017) tells of a successful Hong Kong career woman facing up to impending 30th birthday, and re-evaluating her expectations of life in the process. It began with a shaky start, coming across like a Hong Kong cross between Bridget Jones and Sex and the City, as we’re introduced to calorie neurosis, a going-nowhere relationship with an irresponsible man-child, and all-my-friends-are getting-married crisis. However, the film does improve significantly when a second character, a diametrical opposite of our career girl, is introduced, and events cause people to think about mortality, and what their legacy will be. In its most emotional scenes, the film does not come across as manipulative at all, which was kind of surprising given how derivative the first part of the film was. And a shock revelation towards the end completely blindsided me.
The other point of note is that the film is based on an apparently successful stage play that Pang apparently wrote and starred in, and the film makes little attempt to distance itself from its origins, with scenes from the live show playing over the end credits. While the film didn’t have the air of a play merely being filmed, as a film it probably suffered structurally from trying to stay close to its roots. All in all, not a great masterpiece, but it wasn’t half bad either.
Last edited: